绅士的品格

Chinese expert warns Philippines not to mistake humanitarian accommodation for concession as Philippine military twists facts on Ren’ai Jiao resupply_我的网站

A |     IT之家 7 月 21 日消息，在上周末（7 月 19 日）的 Power On 时事通讯中，彭博社的马克 · 古尔曼（Mark Gurman）指出，苹果出于多方面因素考虑，在指控 OpenAI 的 41 页诉状中，并未点名前苹果公司设计师乔纳森 · 伊夫（Jony Ive）。    

    Screenshot from video obtained by the Global Times on July 21, 2026 shows the transfer of injured Philippine personnel near Ren'ai Jiao, which was overseen and assisted by the China Coast Guard. Photo: Courtesy of the China Coast GuardThe Philippine military side has again claimed that resupplying its grounded warship at Ren'ai Jiao needs no foreign approval and resupply there is within its self-claimed so-called EEZ, while Philippine media acknowledged that 15 "safe" resupply missions were made over the past two years under a China-Philippines provisional arrangement. 
Chinese experts warned on Wednesday that Manila should not mistake humanitarian accommodation for a concession and must bear the consequences if it scraps the arrangement.
Yang Xiao, a research fellow at the Institute of Peaceful Development under the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Wednesday that the Philippine side's claims are fundamentally flawed from legal, historical and practical perspectives. 
Ren'ai Jiao is an inherent part of China's Nansha Qundao, over which China has indisputable and complete sovereignty, Yang said, adding that it is legally untenable for the Philippines to claim that Ren'ai Jiao is part of its exclusive economic zone.
"The Philippines deliberately grounded the abandoned warship at Ren'ai Jiao in 1999 and repeatedly pledged to remove it and restore the reef, but has failed to honor those commitments for more than two decades. This itself constitutes a continuing violation of China's territorial sovereignty," Yang said. 
This is not the first time the Philippines has denied seeking China's approval for resupply missions to Ren'ai Jiao. In April 2025, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun responded to similar claims, saying that China's position on how to handle the current situation at Ren'ai Jiao is clear and consistent.
"First, by keeping its warship grounded at Ren'ai Jiao for decades running, the Philippines has been violating China's sovereignty and the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC). We demand that the Philippines tow away the warship. Second, between now and when the warship is towed away, should the Philippines need to send living necessities, China is willing to allow it in a humanitarian spirit if the Philippines informs China in advance and after on-site verification is conducted. Third, if the Philippines were to send large amount of construction materials to the warship and attempt to build fixed facilities or permanent outpost, China will absolutely not accept it and will resolutely stop it in accordance with the law and regulations," said the spokesperson.
"This means that the Philippines' so-called '15 safe and incident-free resupply missions' were all made possible by China's humanitarian accommodation and strict oversight," Yang stressed. Each mission was reported in advance and allowed to proceed only after inspections confirmed no prohibited construction materials were aboard. The CCG intercepted any such materials through lawful measures, Yang said.
The Philippines' unilateral denial of its notification and inspection obligations while enjoying the arrangement's benefits amounts to a blatant breach of its commitments, the expert noted.
Yang also noted that Manila's narrative contains an obvious logical contradiction. If Philippine resupply missions were truly unimpeded, there would be no need for Manila to repeatedly claim that China had "blocked" its missions and call for international intervention. Yet if China had continuously "obstructed" the missions, the Philippines could not have completed 15 safe and incident-free resupply operations. 
"Manila has simply manipulated its narrative to suit its publicity needs, portraying itself as a 'victim' when seeking international attention while touting smooth resupply operations and its own strength when seeking to project toughness. Its hype over the 15 resupply missions is essentially aimed at rallying domestic support and stoking confrontation internationally to conceal the reality that its illegal presence is tightly constrained," Yang said.
China's handling of the Ren'ai Jiao situation, meanwhile, has consistently reflected restraint and humanitarian considerations. According to a statement by the China Coast Guard (CCG) spokesperson on the transfer of injured personnel by the Philippine side, Jiang Lue, a CCG spokesperson, said that on the morning of July 21, out of humanitarian considerations, China allowed the Philippines to transfer injured personnel by small boats from the BRP Sierra Madre (LT-57), which has been illegally grounded at Ren'ai Jiao, to Philippine Coast Guard vessel 9702. The CCG questioned and verified the Philippine vessels and monitored the entire process.
The CCG will continue to carry out rights-protection and law enforcement operations in accordance with the law in the waters around Ren'ai Jiao to safeguard China's territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests, Jiang said.
Yang said, stressing that Manila's tough talk and one-sided claims cannot make up for its legal and moral shortcomings.
"Any attempt to permanently occupy Chinese islands and reefs, unilaterally tear up the understanding and continuously challenge China's territorial sovereignty runs counter to international law and the broader trend toward peace and development in the region and is ultimately doomed to fail," Yang added.
。         苹果公司于 7 月 12 日向美国加利福尼亚北区联邦地区法院提起诉讼，指控 OpenAI 及其硬件子公司 io Products 通过挖走苹果员工、获取内部文件和接触供应商等方式，盗用苹果商业秘密。         IT之家援引博文介绍，在诉讼文件中，苹果公司将矛头对准了以下几人：          Tang Tan：指控其在苹果任职期间（前 iPhone 产品设计副总裁）提前泄露供应商信息及机密，离职后诱导应聘者携带原型机、CAD 图纸等加入 OpenAI，并系统性转移供应链资源。    Chang Liu：指控其在职期间指导现任苹果同事规避安全审查复制机密文件，面试前传授未发布项目复习要点，并建议改用私人通讯工具（如 LINE）进行违规交流。

B |     Yu-Ting “Alyssa” Peng：在仍任职苹果期间，持续向已跳槽至 OpenAI 的刘畅泄露苹果内部保密硬件项目的核心信息，包括项目进展、供应商决策、工程细节等关键保密内容          古尔曼认为，苹果在诉状中未点名伊夫，其中最主要的原因是苹果公司认为关联性有限。伊夫通过设计公司 LoveFrom 参与 OpenAI 硬件项目，但不负责招聘，也不处理日常运营。

C |          第二个原因是伊夫和乔布斯遗孀 Laurene Powell Jobs 私交甚好，古尔曼指出 Powell Jobs 曾投资于 io Products，并且仍然支持 LoveFrom。         Powell Jobs 虽然不是苹果董事会成员，也不是公司最大股东之一，但“Jobs”这个姓氏在库比蒂诺仍具影响力。消息称苹果公司在起诉 OpenAI 时，曾考虑是否要把伊夫写入其中，最终因为这一层关系而放弃。         第三个原因是舆论观感。伊夫于 2019 年离开苹果，并在 2022 年前担任付费顾问。报道指出在库克执掌苹果公司后，库克更重视运营效率、制造和成本纪律，设计不再居于核心位置。         古尔曼认为如果苹果把伊夫拉入本次诉讼争议中，在法庭作证环节中，法官或者对方律师可能要求其回答对苹果设计地位变化的看法。

Current article:http://3nb.ruidunguizanpaorangchongouxia.sbs/list_g8a3jsq/j1ibiwt.html

Published on:21:03:47